Legal Opinion

Sakil v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 2009No. PD-0971-08PublishedCited by 266 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · MeyersMeyers, J.

Appellant, Eric Sakil, was charged with assault, enhanced under Penal Code Section 22.01(b)(2). 1 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(b)(2) (Vernon 2003). .At trial, a psychiatrist testified to Appellant’s present use of prescription medication and former abuse of drugs and alcohol. The psychiatrist described the behavioral effects of drugs Appellant had used. However, Appellant’s wife, Claudia, told the 911 operator on the day of the incident that Appellant was not intoxicated. Nevertheless, the trial judge believed that the jury might link the evidence of Appellant’s odd behavior on the…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Druery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Barrios v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by266 opinions

  1. Matthew Ryan Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  2. Bazanes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Dusti Kenne Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  4. Lidio Barrios v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  5. Head v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API