Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Claflin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 9, 1889No. 110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL EBOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. The case is stated in the opinion. '

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of the. United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Julius Lisso and John H. Scheen constituted a mercantile partnership engaged in business in the town of Coushatta, Louisiana. Horace B. Claflin, Edward E. Eames and others, constituting the firm of H. B. Claflin & Co., of the city of New York, were, creditors of Lisso and Scheen, and on the 1th day of December, 1878, they commenced, in the proper state court of Louisiana, a suit with an attachment against Lisso and Scheen and their wives; Clara Eorcheimer and Nancy A. Bradley, and others, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Wickersham v. ReevesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  3. Mallory v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  4. Scheen v. ChaffeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  5. Townsend v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holley Equipment Company, a Corporation v. Credit Alliance Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Otto v. FieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  3. McDaniel v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API