Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Otto v. Field
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1925No. 2632PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BICKLEY, J.
The plantiff, appellee here, filed his petition for an alterative writ of mandamus in the district court of Santa Fe county on the - day of October, 1919, where he demanded that the defendant, appellant here, execute to him a deed ivithout any reservation whatsoever for certain state lands Avhich had been applied for by Louis W. Christoph, Avhose rights, were succeeded to by the appellee. The appellant ansivered, alleging that the said appellee had no right to a deed in the form demanded in the petition for the writ" of mandamus, and denying the right of the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State ex rel. Rausch v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Del Curto v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Sproles v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Davidson v. EnfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. King v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.