Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Stroud

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1901No. 380PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of tlie United States for the District of South Carolina.

1Opinion of the Court

KDLONTON, Circuit Judge,

and WADDILL, District Judge. The question at the threshold of this case is upon the motion to dismiss The appeal. Proceedings in involuntary bankruptcy were begun against A. M. Hayes and W. H. Murff, co-partners as Hayes & MurJf, in the Western district of Bouth Carolina. The peí ilion was filed in the name of a large number of creditors, it was duly referred to a referee. By consent of all parties the respondents were declared bankrupts. A trustee was appointed, and creditors were called in. Among other claims was one by II. T. Stroud, who set up a claim for $1,000,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. CurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Chatfield v. O'DwyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Smith v. Mortgage & Debenture Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  4. Semmes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Moore v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. In Re American Fidelity CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  3. The BergenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. Hyde Park Lumber Co. v. West Norwood Building & Loan Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Amick v. Mortgage Security CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API