Hancock v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOREHEAD, Acting Judge:
Richard Hancock was injured while working for his employer on Wal-Mart’s premises. Hancock filed suit in the circuit court, alleging his injuries were the result of Wal-Mart’s negligence. The trial judge granted Wal-Mart’s motion for summary judgment, finding workers’ compensation was Hancock’s exclusive remedy. Hancock appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
Tru-Wheels, Inc., one of Wal-Mart’s vendors, employed Hancock. Tru-Wheels provided Wal-Mart with individuals to assemble and set up Wal-Mart merchandise in the store. Hancock assembled merchandise exclusively for Wal-Mart. On a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edens v. BelliniCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Porter v. Labor DepotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Posey v. Proper Mold & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Brian Coblentz v. Tractor Supply Company (Dissenting)Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024