Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 2003No. 3645PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOREHEAD, Acting Judge:

Richard Hancock was injured while working for his employer on Wal-Mart’s premises. Hancock filed suit in the circuit court, alleging his injuries were the result of Wal-Mart’s negligence. The trial judge granted Wal-Mart’s motion for summary judgment, finding workers’ compensation was Hancock’s exclusive remedy. Hancock appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

Tru-Wheels, Inc., one of Wal-Mart’s vendors, employed Hancock. Tru-Wheels provided Wal-Mart with individuals to assemble and set up Wal-Mart merchandise in the store. Hancock assembled merchandise exclusively for Wal-Mart. On a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edens v. BelliniCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Porter v. Labor DepotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Posey v. Proper Mold & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Brian Coblentz v. Tractor Supply Company (Dissenting)Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API