Legal Opinion

State v. Andrews

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1912No. 10659PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered March 16, 1912, upon a trial and conviction of forgery.

1Opinion of the Court

Gose, J. —

The defendant and one Kastriner were jointly tried and convicted on a charge of knowingly having in their possession a forged instrument with an intent to utter it. The defendant has appealed from the judgment entered *182upon the verdict. Three errors are assigned: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict; (2) error in the instructions, and (3) error in the sentence. The instrument which forms the basis of the charge is as follows:

Seattle, Wash., 2-4-12, 190 No. 18.

THE STATE BANK OF SEATTLE

Pay to the order of Henry B. Shaw, $24.80

Twenty four and 80-100 Dollars.

Not over…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bruen v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State v. FreidrichWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State v. MayoWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State v. McCannWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State v. GillulyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. LouieWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. PettitWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. LydonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Williams v. McCauleyWashington Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API