Legal Opinion

Sprouse v. Skinner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1923No. Nos. 3295, 3296PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The court below, to whom the case was submitted on the pleadings and agreed statement of facts, held and ruled that the assignment and transfer of the policy involved in this case by the assured to his creditor transferred title in the policy to the latter as security for the indebtedness due him; and thereafter, it appearing that at the time of the death of Sprouse he was indebted to Skinner in a sum in excess of $5000, the amount of the face of the policy, the court held that the assignee or transferee of the *122policy was entitled to the entire proceeds…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morris v. Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Exchange Bank v. LohSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Turk v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fields v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Walker v. General InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. Macon National Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Chapman v. Lipscomb-Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Wages v. WagesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API