Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Lipscomb-Ellis Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1942No. 14139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

It is seen from the foregoing statement that the sole question to be decided is whether or not a policy of life insurance, valid when issued, may be collected by the named beneficiary, where during the life of the policy, and after the payment of several annual premiums by the corporate beneficiary, the business relationship which originally and for some years gave rise to the insurable interest was terminated. In other words, is it essential that the insurable interest required by the Code, § 56-901, continue until the death of the person whose life is in sured?…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. RenewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Lacey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  3. Wages v. WagesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Crum v. Jackson National Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  5. Johnson v. Primerica Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API