Legal Opinion

Yogman v. Parrott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 21, 1996No. 94-4377; CA A89262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to enforce a restrictive covenant and to enjoin defendants from renting their vacation home. Defendants appeal from a summary judgment for plaintiffs. Because there is no dispute as to the facts, we review to determine whether summary judgment is appropriate as a matter of law. ORCP 47 C. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs and defendants own houses in Miracle View Annex, a beachfront subdivision in Lincoln County. All of the lots in the subdivision are subject to a set of restrictive covenants that were recorded in 1963. When defendants are not occupying their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alloway v. MoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Johnson v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bruni v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Palmer v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dial Temporary Help Service, Inc. v. DLF International Seeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API