Bruni v. Thacker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to enforce restrictive covenants and to enjoin defendants from violating these covenants by operating a bed and breakfast business in their residence, which is located in the same subdivision as plaintiffs’ residences. Defendants appeal from a summary judgment for plaintiffs. We affirm.
The two principal covenants that plaintiffs argue are violated by the bed and breakfast operation and that are relevant to the issues we discuss, provide in part:
‘ ‘ Only one single family residence, together with appurtenant outbuildings, shall be constructed on a lot.
<<$ # * # *
“…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Lowden v. BosleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Robins v. WalterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Yogman v. ParrottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996