Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Johnston

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1992No. 90-CV-0038-MS; CA A66875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment 1 ordering them to remove their ‘ ‘mobile home’ ’ from their property because it violates a restrictive covenant. On de novo review, we reverse.

Plaintiffs and defendants are present owners of real property in the Indian Ford Meadows subdivision in Sisters. Defendant Johnston purchased property in the subdivision in early 1976. Restrictive covenants for the subdivision were executed in August, 1976. 2 After defendants’ marriage, they purchased a “manufactured home” 3 and moved it to their property in spring, 1987. Plaintiffs filed a complaint in January, 1990,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Schmitt Et Ux v. CulhaneOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Guild v. WallisOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Alloway v. MoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valenti v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Yogman v. ParrottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API