State v. Heisser
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.
The issue in this case is whether defendant and the state entered into a plea agreement, and if so, the terms of that agreement. The parties executed a written plea agreement providing that, at sentencing, the state was “free to seek [upward] departure sentences” within certain limits and, in turn, defendant was “free to seek presumptive sentences.” At sentencing, defendant challenged the timeliness of the state’s notice of intent to seek upward departure sentences. The trial court concluded that the plea agreement barred defendant from making that argument. The trial court also concluded…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Gardner v. MeilingOregon Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Williams v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Wieck v. HostetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- DCIPA, LLC v. Lucile Slater Packard Children's Hospital at StanfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Heine v. Bank of OswegoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.