Legal Opinion

State v. Buckingham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1980No. Nos. 79-620 and 79-803PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

To decide these causes we must determine the conditions under which a Court of Appeals has *15jurisdiction to entertain the state’s appeal from a trial court decision in a criminal case granting defendant’s pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. Since R. C. 2945.67 provides that such an appeal may be prosecuted as a matter of right,1 our inquiry is confined to the limitations imposed by the Ohio Constitution2 and by the Criminal Rules.

The relevant constitutional limitation is the venerable “final order” requirement included in Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution.3 In State v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Euclid v. HeatonOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. DodgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. State v. WallerOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie 0337 BuckeyeOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BasshamOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. CarothersOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API