Legal Opinion

State v. Davidson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1985No. 84-1497PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

R.C. 2505.03 states that a party may only appeal from the trial court’s final order. A final order is any order which, in effect, determines the action in the trial court. R.C. 2505.02. The issue in this case is whether the trial court’s order granting the appellee’s motion “in limine” was a final appealable order. We hold that it was and that it may be appealed pursuant to R.C. 2945.67 and Crim. R. 12(J).

A criminal defendant has the right to appeal from a trial court’s final orders. See Note, Prosecutor Appeals: A Proposal To Revamp The Law In Ohio (1977), 4 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 353.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State v. BuckinghamOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API