Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Roberts

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2003No. 27738PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is a permissive appeal to this Court directly from a magistrate judge’s decision to increase a father’s visitation and prohibit a mother from relocating with the children outside of Cassia and Minidoka Counties to Boise, Idaho.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Larry Roberts (Larry) and Kimberly Roberts (Kimberly) were married in 1985 and had two children prior to divorcing in 1996. As part of the divorce proceedings, the parties signed a “Custody and Property Settlement Agreement” (Custody Agreement) and a “Parenting Plan.”

*403In the Custody Agreement, the parties agreed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Koester v. KoesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Doe v. RoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Nelson v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bartosz v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hopper v. HopperIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API