Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1902PublishedCited by 48 opinions

From. Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Action by Henry M. Wagner against tbe City of Portland. From a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff, tbe defendant appeals. A motion to dismiss tbe appeal was overruled, and the ease was beard on its merits.

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

2Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss tbe appeal herein for two reasons: First, tbe abstract of record contains no assignment of errors relied upon for a reversal of tbe case; *391and, second, appellant has not filed its brief within the time required by the rules of this court. '

1. The procedure on appeal has been materially amended by the late act of the legislative assembly.: Laws, 1899, p. 227. A party may now appeal by giving notice in open court, or before the judge thereof at chambers, at the time of the rendition of the order, judgment, or decree, that he appeals…

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Antin v. Union High School District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Galvin v. Brown & McCabeOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Maxwell v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Wheeler v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API