Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Lee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 13, 2015No. 14-2853PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Daniel Lewis Lee appeals the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion seeking relief from the final judgment entered in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas petition. In his initial habeas petition, Lee had asserted that his trial counsel was ineffective, but he failed to attach any evidence to support that claim. The petition was denied, and Lee subsequently filed a Rule 60(b) motion arguing that his initial habeas counsel had been ineffective for failing to present available evidence. The district court 1 characterized Lee’s motion as a second or successive habeas…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. Mallinckrodt, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Roy William Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Israel Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Darrell Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- In re: FBOP Execution Protocol CasesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Daniel Lewis Lee v. T. J. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. MunozDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.