Legal Opinion
Roy William Harris v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 4, 2004No. 03-2373PublishedCited by 203 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Circuit Judge.
In April 2001, appellant Roy William Harris filed a second petition for habeas corpus relief, alleging for the first time that counsel in his direct appeal had been constitutionally ineffective in failing to appeal two alleged sentencing errors. Pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3), 2255, this Court declined to authorize consideration of that successive petition, and it was dismissed. 1 In July 2002, Harris asserted the ineffectiveness claim again, this time in a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Paul Winestock, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Maurice Mayo v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Puglisi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Ernest Cadet v. State of Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Zhang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Contino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.