Legal Opinion

Lund v. Salt Lake County

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1921No. 3616PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; P. G. Evcms, Judge. Action by Carl R. Lund against Salt Labe County. Judg’ment of dismissal, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injury to certain fish ponds and destruction of fish contained therein situated in Salt Lake County, Utah. The defendant demurred to the complaint. The trial court sustained the «demurrer. Plaintiff elected to stand on his complaint, and an order was made dismissing the action. Judgment was entered accordingly, from which judgment plaintiff appeals.

Three causes of action are alleged: (1) For taking and damaging property for a public use; (2) for a nuisance by which plaintiff’s property was injured and destroyed; (3) for negligent acts and omissions on…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Chicago v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Wagner v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chavez v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Farmers New World Life Insurance Co. v. Bountiful CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bagford v. Ephraim CityUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Strawberry Electric Service District v. Spanish Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Calkins v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API