Legal Opinion
Farmers New World Life Insurance Co. v. Bountiful City
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1990No. 890012PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Farmers New World Life Insurance Company (Farmers) brought this action against Bountiful City (the City) and a number of other defendants to recover damages to a commercial mall owned by Farmers. The original complaint included claims against the City for (1) breach of contract, and (2) inverse condemnation under article I, section 22 of the Utah Constitution. The City moved for summary judgment on all claims, and the trial court granted that motion (the first ruling). Farmers then amended its complaint, adding inverse condemnation claims against Bountiful under the fifth…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- National By-Products, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Bateman v. City of West BountifulCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
- Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.