Legal Opinion

Cavey v. Bethlehem

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1938No. Appeals, 175 and 176PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Baenes,

These actions were brought by pedestrians to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when struck at a street intersection by a motorcycle driven by a police officer of the defendant city, who admittedly was acting within the scope of his duties at the time. Separate actions of trespass were instituted by the plaintiffs, and the two cases were tried together in the court below as the injuries were received in the same accident.

This is the second time these cases have been before this court. At the first trial in the court below the defendant moved for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. King Et Al., Appellants, v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Anderson v. Wood, AppellantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Gilles v. LeasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Reilly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Robb v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Junk v. East End Fire DepartmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Kuzmics v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Goddard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API