Kuzmics v. Santiago
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, President Judge:
This appeal is taken from an order of the court en banc denying appellants’ motion to remove a compulsory nonsuit entered in favor of the City of Bethlehem. The sole issue for our consideration is whether the court erred in refusing to take off the nonsuit. For the following reasons, we hold that it did, and consequently reverse the order of the court below and remand for trial.
Our review of the propriety of the lower court’s decision is governed by the standard that a nonsuit is proper only if the jury, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences arising from…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ford v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Mason v. BittonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Chambers v. Ideal Pure Milk Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Haynes v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Fiser v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Moultrey v. Great a & P Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.