Legal Opinion

Kuzmics v. Santiago

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 577PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, President Judge:

This appeal is taken from an order of the court en banc denying appellants’ motion to remove a compulsory nonsuit entered in favor of the City of Bethlehem. The sole issue for our consideration is whether the court erred in refusing to take off the nonsuit. For the following reasons, we hold that it did, and consequently reverse the order of the court below and remand for trial.

Our review of the propriety of the lower court’s decision is governed by the standard that a nonsuit is proper only if the jury, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences arising from…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ford v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Mason v. BittonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Chambers v. Ideal Pure Milk Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  5. Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Haynes v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Fiser v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Moultrey v. Great a & P Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API