Legal Opinion

B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 11, 1969No. C.D. 3883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case, imported from Mexico, is described on the invoices as “Ixtle Fibre Pads” and was assessed with duty at 20 per centum ad valorem under item 355.05 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as webs, wadding, batting, or nonwoven fabrics, or articles made therefrom, of vegetable fibers. Various claims have been made in the protest and amendments thereto, but those presently relied on are that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem (1) under item 222.64 of said tariff schedules, as articles not specially provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stoner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Reed v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Convertors Division of American Hospital Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  2. Continental Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API