Legal Opinion

Continental Importing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 7, 1969No. C.D. 3917Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of sisal rugs imported from Haiti and entered at the port of New York. It was assessed with duty at 42% per centum ad valorem under item 361.05 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as floor coverings, composed wholly or in part of braids, in continuous lengths, sewn or otherwise bound together but not woven, of textile materials. It is claimed to be properly dutiable at 16 per centum ad valorem under item 222.57, as floor coverings of unspun fibrous vegetable materials, other than common China, India or Japan straw.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barham v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API