Reed v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 32464 (T. D. 33464).
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The merchandise here is birch bark in the condition it is stripped from the tree and the appearance of the exhibit indicates that the tree from which it was taken was of considerable size. What use is made of this bark does not appear of record. No evidence was taken before the Board of General Appraisers. It was returned by the appraiser for duty as a nonenumerated unmanufactured article under paragraph 480 of the tariff act of 1909 and was so assessed by the collector. This assessment was affirmed .by the board.
*96The importers in their protest allege the merchandise to be entitled to free…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Dodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- In re F. W. Myers & Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1903
- McAllister v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. KahnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- George Beurhaus Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Rubber Ass'n of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- A. Millner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.