Legal Opinion

Fish Clearing House, Inc. v. Melchor, Armstrong, Dessau Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1933No. 24548. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blake, J.—The

plaintiff brought this action to recover commissions as a fish broker on account of packs of • mild-cured salmon purchased by defendant in the seasons of 1930 and 1931 from Niehiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd. The plaintiff’s cause of action rests on an oral contract entered into about June 1, 1928, by which, it is alleged, defendant agreed to pay plaintiff a commission of one cent a pound on all mild-cured salmon which defendant might thereafter purchase from the Nichiro company. From a judgment entered on findings favorable to plaintiff, defendant appeals.

For many years, respondent has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hendry v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Peabody v. Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Barash v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Johnson v. UpperWashington Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Bartgis Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Burkle v. Superflow Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Cone v. ArissWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Droste v. Harry Atlas Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Gronvold v. WhaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API