State v. Brown
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAVEZ, Justice.
Appellee Robert Brown was arrested in a Sears store rest room and charged with indecent exposure. By pretrial motion, he moved to suppress “evidence and information seized and obtained” through an allegedly illegal search. The trial court granted the motion, and the State appealed. We affirm.
State’s Failure to Comply with Article 44.01(a)(5)
At the outset, we address the State’s failure to comply with a portion of the statute governing the State’s right to appeal a pretrial order suppressing evidence. See Tex. Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (Vernon Supp.1996). This…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- State v. MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. HailsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- State v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- State v. Washington, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.