Brougham v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
Article IX (§§ 78 to 86, inclusive) of the traffic ordinance (No. 64692) of the city of Seattle sets up a comprehensive plan of impounding vehicles left on the streets in violation of the provisions of the ordinance. By § 78, the chief of police is authorized to designate in writing, filed with the city comptroller, “approved storage garages ... as vehicle pounds to which vehicles may be removed . . .” Section 79 provides that no garage shall be designated as a vehicle pound until the owner shall have posted a surety company bond in the sum of $2,500, conditioned that he will faithfully…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. National Bank v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Simpson v. City of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Prather v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1852
- State Ex Rel. Hubbard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Dickerson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Bennett v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Quinn v. City of VancouverDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.