Legal Opinion

Brougham v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1938No. 26906. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Article IX (§§ 78 to 86, inclusive) of the traffic ordinance (No. 64692) of the city of Seattle sets up a comprehensive plan of impounding vehicles left on the streets in violation of the provisions of the ordinance. By § 78, the chief of police is authorized to designate in writing, filed with the city comptroller, “approved storage garages ... as vehicle pounds to which vehicles may be removed . . .” Section 79 provides that no garage shall be designated as a vehicle pound until the owner shall have posted a surety company bond in the sum of $2,500, conditioned that he will faithfully…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. National Bank v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Simpson v. City of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Prather v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1852
  4. State Ex Rel. Hubbard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Dickerson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bennett v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Quinn v. City of VancouverDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API