Legal Opinion

Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Burden

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1896No. 1,855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Laporte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellant owned and operated a railroad in the vicinity of the appellee’s land. A fire originated on the right of way Which spread to contiguous lands and from thence to the appellee’s land. Adjoining the plaintiff’s lands were marsh lands, and the peaty soil was burned. This action was brought to recover the damages sustained. The first assignment of error calls in question the sufficiency óf the complaint.

It is alleged that a fire originated on the right of way and that the defendant negligently permitted it to escape to contiguous land and from thence to plaintiff’s lands. The gist of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. KrinningIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Smith v. Indianapolis & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. FettigIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. KreigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Consolidated Traction Co. v. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Wabash Railroad v. LackeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API