Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Krinning
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
The facts set up in the complaint are substantially as follows: Appellee was the owner of land in White county, near which, in said county, was and is the railway owned, controlled and operated by appellant; appellant negligently suffered and permitted grass, weeds and other combustible material to grow, mature and accumulate upon its track and right of way in the vicinity of, and in close proximity to, appellee’s land; during July and August, 1881, when the weather was'very warm and dry, said grass, etc., became very dry and combustible, and liable to become fired; on the 29th day of August,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Fent v. Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1871
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. Peninsular Land, Transportation & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.