Legal Opinion

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Miller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1894No. 1,116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

This action was commenced by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages caused by fire.

*193The complaint is in two paragraphs. A demurrer for want of facts was overruled to each. The cause was put at issue by an answer in denial, and tried by the court without the aid of a jury.

The court, at the request of th§ appellant, made a special finding of the facts, stated conclusions of law, and rendered judgment in favor of appellee.

It affirmatively appears from the record, that the finding and judgment are based upon the first paragraph of the complaint.

The first error assigned calls in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. NitscheIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. EhlertIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. CulverIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. BurdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PalmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. PettijohnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Wabash Railroad v. LackeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API