United States v. Munson Steamship Line
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtParker, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Every common carrier subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Aet (49 USCA § 1 et seq.) is required, under penalty, to file with the Interstate Commerce Commission, and print and keep open for public inspection, schedules of its rates, fares, and charges, and conform thereto. 49 USCA § 6. The question in the case is whether the defendant, being admittedly a carrier by water, is subject to the provisions of the act. It is well settled, of course, that water transportation unconnected with transportation by rail is not subject to its provisions.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Sabine Tram Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Goodrich Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Champlain Realty Co. v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Hudson Handkerchief Manufacturing Corp. v. Porto Rican Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- United States v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960