Hoffman v. Van Wyk
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeverson, Justice
[¶1.] Nicholas and Donnelle Hoffman own real property in Douglas County. The Hoffmans learned that Douglas Luebke applied for and received a building permit for a hog confinement unit from Jessica Van Wyk, the Douglas County Planning and Zoning Administrator. The Hoffmans applied for a writ of mandamus compelling Van Wyk and the Douglas County Planning and Zoning Commission to comply with the County’s .zoning ordinance and revoke the building permit. The circuit court held a trial and denied the Hoffmans’ request. The Hoffmans appeal, and Van Wyk counters with a notice of review. We affirm in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Krsnak v. South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GouldingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stockwell v. McCook County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Croell Redi-Mix v. Pennington Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Decramer v. Dorale, McCook County Bd of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025