Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Van Wyk

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2017No. 27977; 27987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeverson, Justice

[¶1.] Nicholas and Donnelle Hoffman own real property in Douglas County. The Hoffmans learned that Douglas Luebke applied for and received a building permit for a hog confinement unit from Jessica Van Wyk, the Douglas County Planning and Zoning Administrator. The Hoffmans applied for a writ of mandamus compelling Van Wyk and the Douglas County Planning and Zoning Commission to comply with the County’s .zoning ordinance and revoke the building permit. The circuit court held a trial and denied the Hoffmans’ request. The Hoffmans appeal, and Van Wyk counters with a notice of review. We affirm in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Krsnak v. South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. GouldingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. McCook County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Croell Redi-Mix v. Pennington Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Decramer v. Dorale, McCook County Bd of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API