Franklin v. Peterson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
This cause comes before us on an agreed statement on appeal (Rule 6, Rules on Appeal). It is a declaratory relief action wherein an attack is made upon the constitutionality of section 21.190 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, being an amendment to article I, chapter 2 of said code. The section in question imposes a gross receipts tax upon persons engaged in various trades, callings, occupations, professions or other means of livelihood, in the sum of $12 per calendar year or fractional part thereof, for the first $12,000 or less of gross receipts, and in addition thereto the sum of one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Philadelphia & Southern Steamship Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Royall v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Lublin v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Weekes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. GlaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- City of Los Angeles v. Rancho Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.