Salt Lake City v. Christensen Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Geo. C. Armstrong, Judge. The Christensen Company, a corporation, was convicted of violating a city ordinance imposing an occupation tas, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeice, J.
On the 21th day of November, 1906, the city, in due form, filed a complaint in the city court wherein it was alleged that the defendant was carrying on a certain business within said city without having complied with certain sections of an ordinance requiring the payment of a certain license tax as therein specified. The defendant, appellant here, demurred to'the complaint. The case, by consent of the parties, was transferred from the city court to the district court *40of Salt Lake county. In connection with tbe demurrer aforesaid the parties submitted the case to the district court upon…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clark v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- City of Newton v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Rosenbloom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- In re WatsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Magneau v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Baker v. MathesonUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Wadsworth v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Raydure v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.