State v. Minter
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The majority opinion was delivered by
FURMAN, P.J.A.D.
Defendant was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, N.J.S.A. 24:21-19(a)(1); 24:21-24 and 2C:5-2, following a jury trial. The jury acquitted him of distribution of cocaine. On appeal defendant argues that the admission against him of two electronically intercepted and taped telephone conversations in *523which he participated violated the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-1 et seq., and was reversible error. We affirm.
The issue is novel in this State under the factual circumstances that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- State v. BalthropSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- State v. ParisiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MinterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- State v. LeonardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANTHONY M. WASHINGTON (17-08-1775, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- State v. MinterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989