Legal Opinion
State v. Minter
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 4, 1989PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
This appeal requires us to balance interests of federalism in application of the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-1 to -26 (hereinafter the wiretap law). In particular, we must resolve whether an intercepted telephone message obtained by a federal agent in accordance with federal wiretap law, which would be admissible in a federal criminal trial, is inadmissible in a state court proceeding because the federal agent did not follow procedures required of state agents under the New Jersey wiretap…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. EversSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Mortgagelinq Corp. v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- North Jersey Newspapers Co. v. Passaic County Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.