Legal Opinion
State v. Minter
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 4, 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
116 N.J. 269 (1989)
561 A.2d 570
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ELYZE A. MINTER, A/K/A BOB MINTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 4, 1989.
Decided August 4, 1989.
Alan I. Moldoff, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney).
Mildred Vallerini Spiller, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by O'HERN, J.
This appeal requires us to balance interests of federalism in application of the New…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.