Legal Opinion

Rottman v. Toft

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 22, 1925:

Owen, J.

It is appellants’ contention that the rights of the parties are fixed by the Braun survey made pursuant to the agreement set forth in the statement of facts. It is their contention that this agreement was the submission to arbitration of a controversy concerning the boundary line, and that, pursuant to well-established principles governing arbitrations, they cannot at this time, in view of the evidence in this case, impeach the findings of the arbitrator.

Sec. 3544, Stats., provides that “Except as otherwise prescribed in this section, two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keachie v. Starkweather Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Donaldson v. BuhlmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Fehrman v. Bissell Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Koepke v. E. Liethen Grain Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Buza v. WojtalewiczWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Nagel v. PhilipsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Chandelle Enterprises, LLC v. XLNT Dairy Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  5. Dechant v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API