Dechant v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweileR, J.
While the difference between the award of $350 and the jury’s verdict of $750 is quite substantial and, under the entire evidence, the latter amount quite persuasively, as an original proposition, is the nearer to plaintiff’s actual loss, yet, as. held by the trial court, such difference is not sufficient, in the absence of the slightest evidence of fraud or want of good faith on the part of the appraisers, to warrant the setting aside of such a determination by those to whom, by agreement of the parties, the matter was submitted. None of the three specific objections presented by *582plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chandos v. American Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Canfield v. Watertown Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Chapman v. Rockford InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Travelers Insurance v. Pierce Engine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Larson v. NygaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farmers Automobile Insurance v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Farmers Automobile Insurance Ass'n v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Quinn v. New York Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- FARMERS AUTO. INS. ASS'N v. Union Pac. Ry.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Margrit Meier v. Wadena Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.