Buza v. Wojtalewicz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hanley, J..Three issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Are the appellants entitled to the 20-foot strip of land under the doctrine of acquiescence;(2) Are the appellants entitled to the 20-foot strip of land under the doctrine of estoppel; and(3) Should this court exercise its power of discretionary reversal under sec. 251.09, Stats., because the result below was inequitable?
Acquiescence.
The doctrine of acquiescence is a supplement to the older and harsher rule of adverse possession which held that adverse intent was the first prerequisite of adverse possession. This meant that in order for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hartung v. WitteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Lorenz v. WolffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Elofrson v. LindsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Pickett v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ward v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Halladay v. CluffUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Mulvaney v. Tri State Truck & Auto Body, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Production Credit Ass'n of Mandan v. Terra Vallee, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Perpignani v. VonasekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.