Legal Opinion

McArthur v. Paxton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 2554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action against defendants as executors of the estate of Charlotte T. Paxton, deceased, to recover for medical services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff to the deceased.

Defendants appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff.

The judgment-roll is accompanied by a bill of exceptions exhibiting the alleged erroneous rulings of the court made in the course of the trial. This bill of exceptions was settled and allowed by the court over plaintiff’s objections, which were embodied in a special bill of exceptions settled at the time. .

In considering the appeal, respondent insists…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moultrie v. TarpioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Whipple v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bernschein v. WhitakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Smith v. SolomonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Baum v. VanattaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API