Legal Opinion

Wrynn v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 11617PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent judge to certify the reporter’s transcript on an appeal from a judgment taken pursuant to section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, and to settle a bill of exceptions as provided by section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on an appeal from a special order made after said judgment was entered.

It appears from the petition that the petitioner instituted a contest of the will of Robert S. Lee, deceased, on the ground that she was a pretermitted heir of the deceased; that after trial the issue was determined adversely to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Spafford v. Citizens' Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In Re Estate of TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Cunningham v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bernschein v. WhitakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Laykin v. KarshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Beckley v. VezuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Dr. Miles California Co. v. BronstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. In Re Estate of LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API