Legal Opinion
State v. Ray
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1899No. 19,024PublishedCited by 11 opinions
From the Lawrence Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
The indictment is based upon §2260 Burns 1894, §2139 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897, and charges that appellees conspired together to bribe one 'William Duncan, a person holding an office o£ trust and profit under the laws of this State, to wit, the office of engineer of gravel roads in Lawrence county. Motion to quash was sustained and the State appeals.
Section 2096 Burns 1894, §2009 R. S. 1881 and Homer 1897, provides that “Whoever corruptly gives, promises or offers to any” person holding any office of trust or profit under the laws of this State “either before or after his election,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State ex rel. Law v. BlendIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. Collett v. GorbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Indianapolis v. BielerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Taggart v. ClaypoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Carty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Edmonds v. Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Bissett v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.