Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Law v. Blend

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1890No. 15,164PublishedCited by 41 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

— The information in this cause charges that the relators, Edward E. Law, Alexander H. Foster and Adolph Goeke, constitute the board of metropolitan police of the city of Evansville; that each of said relators was duly appointed a commissioner of police of said city by the Governor, secretary of state, auditor of state and treasurer of state, of the State of Indiana, pursuant to the provisions of the act providing for a metropolitan police in all cities of twenty-nine thousand or more inhabitants, etc., the same being chapter 74 of the acts of the .Legislature of the State of Indiana for the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. The People v. . Simeon DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  4. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. CovingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  5. City of Evansville v. State ex rel. BlendIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People Ex Rel. Farrington v. . MenschingNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Tucker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Parshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API