Legal Opinion

United States v. National City Bank of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 16, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant, The National City Bank, under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, for a more definite statement and a bill of particulars of certain matters in plaintiff’s reply which it is urged is not alleged with sufficient definiteness and particularity to enable defendant to prepare for trial.

The plaintiff, United States of America, sues to recover from the defendant $285,-036.19 allegedly due the Volga Kama Commercial Bank, a pre-Soviet Russian corporation, for a credit balance existing in its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Coronet Phosphate Co. v. United States Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  3. Empresa Agricola Chicama Ltda. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  4. Fleming v. Southern Kraft Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. Marin v. KnopfDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Iafrate v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  2. FAR Liquidating Corporation v. BrownellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  3. Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. Finne v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N. V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API