Legal Opinion
FAR Liquidating Corporation v. Brownell
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 18, 1955No. Civ. A. 1462PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
This is an action by F.A.R. Liquidating Corporation, a Delaware corporation, against the Attorney General of the United States, under 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a). Plaintiff seeks recovery of 111 patents vested by defendant, acting under the authority of the Trading With the Enemy Act. On cross-motions, summary judgment was awarded in plaintiff’s favor. F.A.R. Liquidating Corporation v. McGranery, D.C.Del., 110 F. Supp. 580. Such summary judgment was reversed on appeal with instructions to the District Court to proceed in accordance with the mandate. 3 Cir., 209 F. 2d 375.
Pla…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- F.A.R. Liquidating Corp. v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clyde Philp v. Sam MacRi Pauline MacRi Joseph MacRi Eleanor MacRi Don R. MacRi Kathleen N. MacRi Herman Howe and Viola B. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Sheats v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- F. A. R. Liquidating Corp. v. BrownellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- F. A. R. Liquidating Corporation v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States of America, Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Kober v. BrownellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.