Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.'
Plaintiff moves for an order to direct the defendant to give proper and sufficient answers to enumerated interrogatories, also to direct the defendant to give further answers to other enumerated interrogatories when the facts relating thereto' become known to the defendant. It is claimed that the answers heretofore served are insufficient.
In the first group are interrogatories which require the defendant to specify the foreign law upon which nine defenses and its counterclaim are based. The defendant answered that the subject matter was beyond its competence, “being…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Bernstein v. N. v. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart - MaatschappijCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Dainese v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Coronet Phosphate Co. v. United States Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCall v. Overseas Tankship Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Riley v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Telesphore Couture v. WatkinsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Markovic v. National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952