Legal Opinion
Simon Junger v. Hertz, Neumark & Warner
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 6, 1970No. 128, Docket 33701PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
Junger brought this action under the securities laws, seeking to recover $5,000 he lost because Hertz, Neumark & Warner, a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange, allegedly violated section 7(c) of the Securities Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78g(c) (1964) by its participation in certain transactions which occurred in 1965 and 1966. Section 7(c) provides that
It shall be unlawful for any * * * broker * * * directly or indirectly, to extend or maintain credit or arrange for the extension or maintenance of credit to or for any customer—(1) On any security * * * in contravention of the rules and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moscarelli v. StammDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Remar v. Clayton Securities CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Meisel v. North Jersey Trust Co. of Ridgewood, New Jersey, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
3Cited by17 opinions
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Armstrong v. McalpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Barbara B. Sack v. V. T. Low, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name of Bear, Stearns & Co., and Richard W. SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Daniel L. SHULL, Appellant, v. DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC., a Corporation, and Harry Ware, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.