Legal Opinion
Daniel L. SHULL, Appellant, v. DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC., a Corporation, and Harry Ware, Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1977No. 76-1935PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Circuit Judge.
During 1972 and 1973 plaintiff, Daniel L. Shull of Lincoln, Nebraska, speculated heavily in a certain corporate stock, referred to in the record and briefs as Champion Home Builders stock (Champion). In 1972 he bought largely on margin and borrowed large sums of money from Nebraska banks to make the required down payments and meet margin calls. During most of the first half of 1972 the price of the stock rose sharply; it then fell dramatically and continued to fall throughout 1973. Plaintiff dealt with the brokerage firm of Dain, Kal-man & Quail, Inc. (DKQ) of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- The Greater Iowa Corporation v. Frank McLendonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Herm v. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Kirshner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,249 Homer E. Stephenson and Freda Lois Stephenson, His Wife v. Calpine Conifers Ii, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.